AB163. SOH25_AB_317. Ameloblastomas: a review of surgical versus non-surgical management
Head & Neck Session

AB163. SOH25_AB_317. Ameloblastomas: a review of surgical versus non-surgical management

Eva Danaher, Akinsola Ogunbowale, Michael Gilbride, Hamid Ramadan, Liadh Hanrahan, Sarah Young, Alison McCullagh, Damien Smith, Nabil Omair

Oral and Maxillofacial Department, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland


Background: Ameloblastomas are benign odontogenic tumours of epithelial origin that develop in both the maxilla and mandible. Despite their slow growth and benign nature, they are locally invasive and carry a risk of malignancy. These tumours represent about 10% of all odontogenic tumours. Historically, the preferred treatment was complete resection with a margin of at least 1 cm, given their invasive nature and high recurrence rates. However, more recently, less invasive approaches, both surgical and non-surgically, are being considered in the management of cases for preservation of vital structures and quality of life. This literature review focuses on the changing trends of ameloblastoma treatment and the efficacy of non-invasive and invasive methods and their rates of recurrence.

Methods: An electronic search was carried out on databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria include human studies, ameloblastoma of both maxilla and mandible, as well as surgical and non-surgical treatment. Exclusion criteria include articles published before 1990. The primary outcome was efficacy of treatment, and the secondary outcome was recurrence rates.

Results: Most conservative treatment methods, although effective, had a recurrence rate of at least 21%, ameloblastoma subtype dependent. More radical treatment methods had a reduced recurrence rate but significant impact on the overall wellbeing of patients.

Conclusions: For more extension lesions, less invasive treatment may be seen as a sensible preliminary treatment method to conserve vital structures and patient quality of life. Surgical intervention has a reduced rate of recurrence but significant morbidity. Careful diagnosis, planning, and treatment staging are needed.

Keywords: Ameloblastoma; cyst; multicystic; odontogenic tumour; unicystic


AcknowledgmentsOther Section

None.


FootnoteOther Section

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab163
Cite this abstract as: Danaher E, Ogunbowale A, Gilbride M, Ramadan H, Hanrahan L, Young S, McCullagh A, Smith D, Omair N. AB163. SOH25_AB_317. Ameloblastomas: a review of surgical versus non-surgical management. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB163.

Download Citation