AB161. SOH25_AB_185. Outcomes of elective neck radiation in adenoid cystic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Head & Neck Session

AB161. SOH25_AB_185. Outcomes of elective neck radiation in adenoid cystic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Emma Finnegan1, Andrew O’Brien2, Eoin Cleere1, Justin Hintze1, Michael Ryan1, Conall Fitzgerald1

1Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; 2Department of Otolaryngology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland


Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare head and neck malignancy primarily located in the salivary glands. Management of node-negative (N0) disease in ACC remains contentious, with conflicting evidence and limited guidelines on elective nodal irradiation (ENI). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effect of ENI on clinical outcomes in patients with head and neck ACC.

Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception until the 18th of October 2024. Eligibility criteria included head and neck ACC studies comparing ENI with neck observation. Statistical analysis utilised random-effects models to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence and survival outcomes, respectively.

Results: This study included eight non-randomised studies involving 553 patients. Over half, 51.2% (n=283), received ENI, and 48.8% (n=270) were in the observation group. The ENI group had reduced rates of cervical nodal recurrence [RR 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.51; P=0.002] but no difference in overall survival (HR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.52–1.68; P=0.83). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a reduction in cervical nodal recurrence in ACC of major salivary gland origin (RR 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01–0.69; P=0.02) but not sinonasal primary sites (RR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.10–2.42; P=0.38). Complications of ENI were poorly reported, with documented adverse effects including fibrosis and desquamation.

Conclusions: ENI reduces cervical nodal recurrence in selected subgroups but does not improve overall survival. These findings suggest ENI is not appropriate for widespread use but may benefit carefully selected N0 patients.

Keywords: Adenoid cystic; elective nodal irradiation (ENI); head and neck cancer; salivary cancer; node negative neck


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab161
Cite this abstract as: Finnegan E, O’Brien A, Cleere E, Hintze J, Ryan M, Fitzgerald C. AB161. SOH25_AB_185. Outcomes of elective neck radiation in adenoid cystic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB161.

Download Citation