AB147. SOH25_AB_377. An audit of the prescription and implementation of spinal precautions in patients with actual or suspected spinal cord injuries at a level 3 university teaching hospital
Orthopaedic Session II

AB147. SOH25_AB_377. An audit of the prescription and implementation of spinal precautions in patients with actual or suspected spinal cord injuries at a level 3 university teaching hospital

Patrick Sweeney, Eilis Fitzgerald, Emma O’Farrell, Peter Dawson

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland


Background: Spinal injuries with suspected spinal cord injury are a common presentation to emergency departments (EDs). Best practice guidelines advise prescription of various spinal precaution measures regarding immobilisation, manual handling, transfer, and patient inclination in anticipation of definitive diagnosis and treatment. Appropriate spinal precautions can prevent further injury, facilitate communication, and enhance patient safety. Inappropriate precautions can inadvertently contribute to patient harm and stress. The aims of this clinical audit are two-fold: firstly, to measure the degree of adherence with, and implementation of, spinal precautions according to our local spinal precaution guideline. Secondly, to measure the appropriateness of prescribed precautions, relative to the injury sustained.

Methods: Local spinal precautions proforma was used as the standard against which current practice was measured. Admissions and ED referrals to the orthopaedic surgery service were prospectively screened over 3 months for patients sustaining spinal injuries. Data pertaining to completion of local spinal precautions proforma was collected from medical notes. Results were analysed and presented to the orthopaedic department with a teaching session on implementation of spinal precautions. Audit cycle will be repeated following a 1-month period, closing the audit loop.

Results: Current preliminary data demonstrated sub-optimal adherence with appropriate spinal precautions implementation. Notably, a discordance between prescribed range of inclination, and inclination implemented was observed.

Conclusions: We believe completion of this closed-loop audit cycle can enhance adherence with, and implementation of, appropriate spinal precaution measures. This can facilitate patient safety, and enhance communication among healthcare professionals. We believe this also demonstrates the importance of continuous audit and quality improvement (QI) in clinical practice.

Keywords: Trauma; spinal cord injury; spinal precautions; clinical audit; quality improvement


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab147
Cite this abstract as: Sweeney P, Fitzgerald E, O’Farrell E, Dawson P. AB147. SOH25_AB_377. An audit of the prescription and implementation of spinal precautions in patients with actual or suspected spinal cord injuries at a level 3 university teaching hospital. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB147.

Download Citation