AB142. SOH25_AB_283. Introduction of a robotic ventral mesh rectopexy programme in a tertiary robotic centre
Colorectal Session

AB142. SOH25_AB_283. Introduction of a robotic ventral mesh rectopexy programme in a tertiary robotic centre

Alice Moynihan, Tim Nugent, Fiachra Cooke, Liam Devane, Peter McCullough, Peter Neary, Niamh Foley

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland


Background: Rectal prolapse, affecting 2.5/100,000 of the population, significantly impacts quality of life. Trans-abdominal and perineal approaches have been the mainstay of surgical management, but there are associated high recurrence rates. Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (R-VMR) is a minimally invasive alternative, that offers improved visualisation, precise dissection and reduced morbidity. R-VMR was introduced to our unit in March 2024. This case series outlines our early experience with the technique in a high volume robotic colorectal surgery centre.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing R-VMR in the first eight months of the programme was performed. Pre-operative endoscopic, radiological and clinical examination findings were collated. Pre-operative and 6-week post-operative faecal incontinence scores (FISs) were compared. Patients underwent R-VMR via a standardised approach by a single fellowship trained surgeon. The enhanced consent form available on the pelvic floor society website was utilised.

Results: A total of six women underwent R-VMR. Five patients attended via the pelvic floor clinic while one presented emergently via the emergency department. The mean age was 75 years. The mean number of vaginal delivery was 3.6. All patients had full thickness rectal prolapse. There were no intra- or post-operative complications. No patients developed recurrence of prolapse within the follow-up period. Mean relative improvement in FIS was 53%.

Conclusions: In a carefully selected cohort of patients, R-VMR can safely be implemented in a high-volume robotic surgery centre, offers an additional treatment option for rectal prolapse and has relatively lower recurrence rates compared with perineal approaches.

Keywords: Incontinence; pelvic floor surgery; rectal prolapse; robotic surgery; ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR)


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab142
Cite this abstract as: Moynihan A, Nugent T, Cooke F, Devane L, McCullough P, Neary P, Foley N. AB142. SOH25_AB_283. Introduction of a robotic ventral mesh rectopexy programme in a tertiary robotic centre. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB142.

Download Citation