AB132. SOH25_AB_111. Evaluating patient satisfaction of a multidisciplinary pain management programme
Anaesthesia Session

AB132. SOH25_AB_111. Evaluating patient satisfaction of a multidisciplinary pain management programme

Katie Fitzpatrick, Fiona Irwin, Roisin Hosie, Ann Marie Kiernan, Dominic Harmon

Department of Anaesthesia, Croom Orthopaedic Hospital, Croom, Ireland


Background: Chronic pain often undermines physical, emotional, and social well-being. Multidisciplinary pain management programs (PMPs) aim to enhance coping, mental health, and social support. This study assessed patient satisfaction and outcomes in a PMP delivered both online and in-person in small groups.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, with 32 participants completing feedback forms and standardized assessments. Quantitative measures included changes in pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and mental well-being. Qualitative feedback gathered through questionnaires and a focus group explored coping skills, social support, and experiences with staff.

Results: Pain self-efficacy improved by 4% (n=19), pain catastrophizing decreased by 14% (n=19), and mental well-being increased by 12.5% (n=10). Participants reported enhanced coping skills, including understanding emotions, self-care, and managing anger. Social support was a significant benefit, with one participant sharing, “For the first time, I was amongst people who were the same. It was a total blessing”. Feedback highlighted high satisfaction: 100% found talks easy to understand and beneficial, 93% gained new knowledge, and 41% specifically mentioned appreciating pacing strategies. Online sessions were valued for accessibility, while in-person groups fostered connection but were physically taxing.

Conclusions: This PMP effectively improved key psychosocial outcomes and was highly valued by participants for its compassionate staff, practical strategies, and group support. Tailored options for online and in-person delivery were appreciated, underscoring the importance of flexibility and individualization in managing chronic pain. Findings support the ongoing development of multidisciplinary approaches to chronic pain care.

Keywords: Pain management; chronic pain; self-management; multidisciplinary pain education; patient education


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab132
Cite this abstract as: Fitzpatrick K, Irwin F, Hosie R, Kiernan AM, Harmon D. AB132. SOH25_AB_111. Evaluating patient satisfaction of a multidisciplinary pain management programme. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB132.

Download Citation