AB090. SOH25_AB_167. Challenging the status quo: is routine histopathological examination necessary after all cholecystectomies?
Plenary Session

AB090. SOH25_AB_167. Challenging the status quo: is routine histopathological examination necessary after all cholecystectomies?

Millicent Hamadziripi, Amy Gillis

Department of General Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland


Background: Routine histopathological examination of gallbladders after cholecystectomy is a standard practice to detect incidental gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. While comprehensive, this approach may not be cost-effective or sustainable in low-incidence populations such as Ireland. This study evaluates the diagnostic yield of routine histopathology and explores the feasibility of a selective approach based on known risk factors of GBC, with potential benefits in cost and promoting sustainability in surgery.

Methods: A retrospective review of 935 gallbladder specimens submitted for histopathology over 5 years [2019–2023] at our institution was conducted. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological data were analysed to identify cases of GBC and associated risk factors. Cases of confirmed gallbladder carcinoma were reviewed in detail to identify clinical, radiological, and macroscopic predictors of malignancy.

Results: Two patients (0.21%) with GBC were identified. Both patients had risk factors, including age >50 years, gallbladder polyps (>1 cm), and abnormal imaging findings. None of the patients had macroscopically abnormal features intraoperatively. Our findings are consistent with international evidence supporting the use of selective histopathology for specimens with identifiable risk factors, reducing the workload and cost without compromising patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Given the low incidence of GBC in our population, adopting a selective approach to gallbladder histopathology is a safe and cost-effective alternative to routine examination. Such a protocol could reduce resource consumption, and energy use in pathology laboratories. As evidenced in Sweden and the Netherlands, this approach is implemented nationally, and a selective approach may maintain high diagnostic accuracy while optimizing resource utilization.

Keywords: Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC); cholecystectomy; histopathology; selective approach; sustainability


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab090
Cite this abstract as: Hamadziripi M, Gillis A. AB090. SOH25_AB_167. Challenging the status quo: is routine histopathological examination necessary after all cholecystectomies? Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB090.

Download Citation