AB066. SOH25_AB_186. An audit of emergency surgical admission documentation—do we need a surgical proforma?
General Surgery II

AB066. SOH25_AB_186. An audit of emergency surgical admission documentation—do we need a surgical proforma?

Zaka Ullah Khan, Sasikala Arumugam, Ralph Golden, Jaiying Lau, Iftikhar Ahmed

Department of Surgery, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland


Background: Admission notes are important source of clinical information. These notes provide accurate information about patient current condition, further management plan and carry a medico-legal significance. Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines for Clinicians on Medical Records and Notes [1994] provides a framework and benchmark on surgical admission notes. The aim of this audit is to assess the compliance of emergency surgical admission clerking as per guidelines formulated by Royal College of Surgeon of England.

Methods: All patients admitted under general surgery emergency take through emergency from 1st till 20th October 2023 were retrospectively assessed for inclusion. A total of 46 patient notes were retrieved. Emergency surgery admission notes are assessed for completeness by a validated proforma based on the Royal college of Surgeon of England. Surgical Consult notes and pediatric population (age less than 18 years) were excluded.

Results: Out of 32 criteria, only 8 criteria have completion rate of 100%. Thirteen criteria were completed between 50% to 99%. Eleven criteria were sub-optimal (less than 50% completion). In particular, activities of daily living (21%), employment (42.8%), cardiovascular exam (19.5%), respiratory exam (19.5%), height (0%), weight (0%) and urine pregnancy test (0% in child bearing age). Review of systems have poor standardization in documentation and only formally documented in 4% of patients

Conclusions: The emergency surgical admission clerking in Sligo University hospital is sub-optimal according to guidelines set by Royal College of Surgeons of England. Documentation can be improved in 21 surgically relevant parameters. Incomplete documentation is associated with increased risk of adverse event with medico-legal consequences. A standardized proforma will be formulated as per guidelines to improve the overall documentation follow by re-audit cycle in three month time.

Keywords: Admission notes; clerking; criteria; documentation; emergency


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab066
Cite this abstract as: Khan ZU, Arumugam S, Golden R, Lau J, Ahmed I. AB066. SOH25_AB_186. An audit of emergency surgical admission documentation—do we need a surgical proforma? Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB066.

Download Citation