AB193. SOH24AB_176. A retrospective analysis of orbital floor reconstruction at University Hospital Limerick over last 2 years
Head & Neck Poster Session

AB193. SOH24AB_176. A retrospective analysis of orbital floor reconstruction at University Hospital Limerick over last 2 years

Louise Barry, Francesca Lee, Saoirse Kilgarriff, Mark Wilson, Akinsola Ogunbowale

Oral and Maxillofacial Department, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland


Background: A high instance of orbital floor fractures (OFFs) is observed in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department, University Hospital Limerick (UHL). Typical diagnosis is by clinical and radiographic examination using computed tomography (CT). Many recent studies have looked at varying approaches for orbital floor reconstruction (OFR). The aim of this case series is to analyse the demographics, aetiology and management of patients who underwent OFR.

Methods: A two-year retrospective case series was completed examining charts of patients who underwent reconstruction of orbital floor defects at UHL.

Results: The factors that had the greatest influence on surgical decision making were defects causing persistent diplopia, globe malposition or entrapment. The study included 22 patients who underwent OFR. Radiographic pre-operative assessment using CT scans was completed for 91% of patients, of which 6% had CT orbit, 86% had CT facial bones and 36% had both CT facial bones and CT brain. 50% of patients were treated with the transconjunctival approach and 50% with the sub-tarsal transcutaneous approach. Reconstruction techniques included the use of titanium mesh (45%), Stryker® pre-formed anatomic plates (50%) and 5% polydioxanone sheet (PDS).

Conclusions: Both treatment approaches and materials used are viable and operator specific. Both have complications but similar outcomes based on post-operative review. The pre-operative use of CT facial bones should be included as a clinical standard prior to OFR. A clear need exists for improvement in data analysis to guide and set standards of care for the specialties managing OFR.

Keywords: Orbital floor reconstruction (OFR); Stryker pre formed plates; sub tarsal; titanium mesh plate; transconjunctival


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-24-ab193
Cite this abstract as: Barry L, Lee F, Kilgarriff S, Wilson M, Ogunbowale A. AB193. SOH24AB_176. A retrospective analysis of orbital floor reconstruction at University Hospital Limerick over last 2 years. Mesentery Peritoneum 2024;8:AB193.

Download Citation