AB110. SOH24AB_164. Right patient, right time, right endoscopic procedure?—A single centre retrospective review of inpatient endoscopy procedures in Portiuncula University Hospital
General Surgery Session II

AB110. SOH24AB_164. Right patient, right time, right endoscopic procedure?—A single centre retrospective review of inpatient endoscopy procedures in Portiuncula University Hospital

Eibhlin Burns Beattie1, Oisin O’Donnell2, Jack Kelly2, Joseph Garvin2, Ali Chaudhary2, Osama Abbas El-Sadig2, Eddie Myers2

1Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Garraun, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland; 2Department of Surgery, Portiuncula University Hospital, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway, Ireland


Background: There is insufficient published research on inpatient endoscopy, despite its ubiquity. This available research concerns increased length of stay, poor bowel preparation and a potential increase in readmission. Due to an increase in inpatient endoscopy procedures, concerns were raised locally querying the appropriateness of indications. The primary outcome of the research evaluated indications, diagnostic efficacy, and safety of inpatient endoscopy.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of inpatient endoscopy was performed for one calendar year. All gastrointestinal (GI) inpatient endoscopy procedures were included. Non-GI endoscopy (cystoscopy, bronchoscopy) and outpatient procedures were excluded. Assessment of the validity of indication was compared against the Health Service Executive (HSE) Triage Guidance for Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures. Secondary outcomes will be extracted from the charts and input to MS excel for analysis.

Results: Total inpatient endoscopy procedures: 135, average age 66 years. With the elderly patients, a significant number were nursing home residents, 7, and patients who died within the study period, 19. Appropriateness of indication compared to HSE guidance: 22.73%. Diagnostic yield: 21.48%

Conclusions: Our research has shown a significant amount of inpatient endoscopy procedures may be more suited to an outpatient setting or may be unnecessary. We found that when performed, the inpatient endoscopy did not result in an explanatory diagnosis to the patient’s presentation. The results highlighted the need for local interventions to improve the service and better utilise the invaluable resource of endoscopy.

Keywords: Endoscopy; guidelines; indications; inpatient; intervention


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-24-ab110
Cite this abstract as: Burns Beattie E, O’Donnell O, Kelly J, Garvin J, Chaudhary A, El-Sadig OA, Myers E. AB110. SOH24AB_164. Right patient, right time, right endoscopic procedure?—A single centre retrospective review of inpatient endoscopy procedures in Portiuncula University Hospital. Mesentery Peritoneum 2024;8:AB110.

Download Citation