AB091. SOH24AB_092. Biomechanical and ergonomic risks associated with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction amongst surgeons: a systematic review
Orthopaedic Session I

AB091. SOH24AB_092. Biomechanical and ergonomic risks associated with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction amongst surgeons: a systematic review

Kasie O’Reilly1, Jake McDonnell2, Roisin Dolan1, Barry O’Sullivan1, Jamie Martin-Smith1

1Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland


Background: Surgeons are at high risk of developing musculoskeletal symptoms due to a range of factors including, maladaptive positioning, surgical ergonomics, and surgeon characteristics. Cervical muscle strain and biomechanical load is most prevalent due to repetitive motions and prolonged static neck positioning. However, recommendations to improve cervical health of surgeons are limited. This issue is apparent through reports of prevalence between 10–74.4% among surgeons. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an objective assessment of the clinical evidence available and a descriptive analysis of the effects of kinematics and surgical ergonomics on the prevalence of surgeons’ cervical musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: A total of 2,474 articles were identified on initial search, of which 1,046 were duplicates and were removed from review. Abstracts and full texts remaining were then screened, with 9 studies included in the final qualitative analysis.

Results: The use of loupes, open surgery and excessive neck flexion (>30 degrees) were associated with cervical dysfunction. Comparison of study outcomes was challenging due to heterogeneity within study methods and the paucity of methodological quality. This precluded formal meta-analysis.

Conclusions: The current literature assessing ergonomic and biomechanical factors predisposing surgeons to cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction is insufficient to provide reliable guidance for clinicians. Although the literature has identified factors that contribute to work-related cervical dysfunction, few have attempted to evaluate interventions for improved surgical ergonomics. An objective assessment of interventions that promote postural correction with the aim to improve neck pain scores in surgeon cohorts is warranted.

Keywords: Neck; cervical spine; surgeons; posture; pain


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-24-ab091
Cite this abstract as: O’Reilly K, McDonnell J, Dolan R, O’Sullivan B, Martin-Smith J. AB091. SOH24AB_092. Biomechanical and ergonomic risks associated with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction amongst surgeons: a systematic review. Mesentery Peritoneum 2024;8:AB091.

Download Citation