AB022. SOH24AB_139. A 10-year review of general paediatric urology cases performed in a non-specialist centre in Ireland
Paediatric Session

AB022. SOH24AB_139. A 10-year review of general paediatric urology cases performed in a non-specialist centre in Ireland

Amanda Troy, Kevin Keane, Keith Gerraghty, Orla Cullivan, Irfan Afridi, Mohamed Khalid, Mohammed Aboelmagd, John Keane, Padraig Daly

Department of Urology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland


Background: The Urology Model of Care recommends “satellite centres for managing general paediatric urology conditions in model 4 centres outside of Dublin” should be utilised for service provision. It states that that all new urology posts should have components of paediatric urology in the job description. However, most trainees will not rotate through a specialist paediatric urology unit. We reviewed the paediatric urology operative cases in a model 4 hospital.

Methods: Procedures performed in children aged <16 years between 2012–2022 at University Hospital Waterford were identified using local surgical databases, and only urology patients were isolated. Medical charts, electronic outpatient records and operation databases were accessed to collect data concerning demographics, emergency/elective presentation, operation performed, length of stay, complications and follow-up.

Results: A total of 441 paediatric urology operations (357 circumcisions, 45 orchidopexies, 16 orchidectomies, 14 hydrocoele repairs and 9 “other” scrotal explorations) were performed on children between the ages of 2–15 years old. Of the 45 orchidopexies performed, 13 were elective inguinal orchidopexy [10 undescended testes (UDT), 2 retractile testes, 1 trauma] and 32 were emergency scrotal orchidopexy (11 torsion, 14 pain, 4 appendage torsion, 3 trauma). Of circumcisions, 18 were performed as emergencies and 339 were elective. Median length of stay for orchidopexy and circumcisions was 1 day. Median follow-up for orchiopexy was 3 months.

Conclusions: Due to demand, the use of model 4 hospitals outside of Dublin for general paediatric urology cases will likely continue. In experienced hands, these cases can be performed safely. Prospective studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes particularly regarding inguinal orchidopexy for UDT.

Keywords: Ireland; model 4; non-specialist; paediatric; urology


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-24-ab022
Cite this abstract as: Troy A, Keane K, Gerraghty K, Cullivan O, Afridi I, Khalid M, Aboelmagd M, Keane J, Daly P. AB022. SOH24AB_139. A 10-year review of general paediatric urology cases performed in a non-specialist centre in Ireland. Mesentery Peritoneum 2024;8:AB022.

Download Citation