AB153. SOH23ABS_228. A retrospective review of patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms and the best practice guidance for the management of these tumors
General Posters

AB153. SOH23ABS_228. A retrospective review of patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms and the best practice guidance for the management of these tumors

Thea Ramanathan, Meghan Choy, Lauren O’Connell, Mark Regan, Myles Joyce, Babak Meshkat, Aisling Hogan, Emmeline Nugent

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland


Background: Appendiceal neoplasms include a heterogeneous group of tumors that exhibit varying malignant potential. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the appendix are the most common type. The surgical outcomes of appendiceal neoplasms depend on the location, grade, size of tumor, positive lymph nodes and metastasis. For metastatic disease and peritoneal invasion, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have become the standard of care, but the need for this therapy can be a challenging decision. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) often have a large role to play in the discussion and management of individual patient care.

Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained gastrointestinal oncology database of 1,408 patients in our institution was conducted ranging from 2018 to 2022. Patients with histologically confirmed neoplasms of the appendix were identified. Patients with a non-appendix primary were excluded from the analysis. A total of 32 people were found to have primary appendiceal neoplasms, and this data was used in the study.

Results: A total of 32 patients were diagnosed with a primary appendix neoplasm over the study period (n=32). The incidence rate was 0.17, with a total of 767 appendicectomies performed over this period. Of the total cohort, five were aged <18 years at time of index surgery. Pseudomyxoma peritonei was the presenting complaint in two patients. Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) and well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) were the most commonly represented pathology (11 per group), with 6 mucinous adenocarcinomas, 3 goblet cell adenocarcinomas and 1 benign schwannoma. A proportion of 71% (23) were treated with appendicectomy or caecectomy as their index surgical procedure. Of these 8 proceeded to further surgery (7 completion right hemicolectomy, 1 cytoreduction and HIPEC). Five patients were referred to the national NET MDT, of which three were paediatric patients.

Conclusions: The majority of patients with benign appendix neoplasms may be effectively managed via the local MDT. Consideration of referral to the national NET MDT or CRS-HIPEC unit should be considered for paediatric patients or those presenting with advanced disease.

Keywords: Appendix neoplasms; multidisciplinary management; neuroendocrine tumours; carcinoid tumours; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-23-ab153
Cite this abstract as: Ramanathan T, Choy M, O’Connell L, Regan M, Joyce M, Meshkat B, Hogan A, Nugent E. AB153. SOH23ABS_228. A retrospective review of patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms and the best practice guidance for the management of these tumors. Mesentery Peritoneum 2023;7:AB153.

Download Citation