AB180. SOH22ABS229. Surgical management and post-operative functional outcomes of patients with penile fracture: a retrospective review of a single institution’s experience over 10 years
General Posters

AB180. SOH22ABS229. Surgical management and post-operative functional outcomes of patients with penile fracture: a retrospective review of a single institution’s experience over 10 years

Yazan Qaoud, Sarah Norton, Ati Ferede, James Forde, Richard Power, Gordon Smyth, Dilly Little, Mark Quinlan, Niall Davis, Waleed Mohammed, Ponnusamy Mohan

Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland


Background: Immediate surgical intervention has been shown to yield good clinical outcomes in patients with penile fractures. We report a single institution experience of this relatively uncommon injury.

Methods: Theatre logbooks were manually screened, between 2011 and 2021, to identify patients who underwent penile exploration for suspected fracture. Patients found to not have a fracture intra-operatively and patients with missing clinical data were excluded from the analysis.

Results: After exclusion of 2 patients due to missing clinical data, we identified 15 patients that underwent surgical exploration, 11 of which having a confirmed penile fracture intra-operatively. ‘Aubergine sign’ was present in all patients at initial presentation. Trauma to the erect penis during sexual intercourse was the most common mechanism of injury (9/11, 81.8%). Of the 11 patients, 6 had unilateral injury of one corporal body, 3 had injury of both corpora cavernosa, 1 one had a buck’s fascia tear, and 1 had involvement of both corporal bodies as well as corpus spongiosum. There were 4 cases of associated urethral injury identified and repaired at the time of surgery. One of these patients later required a formal urethroplasty due to stricture disease and urge incontinence. All patients had preserved erections post-operatively, however two reported erectile dysfunction and were prescribed phosphodiesterase inhibitors.

Conclusions: Results of our cohort show an excellent erectile function outcome following surgical repair of penile fracture. Four patients had a urethral injury evident, one of whom required a formal urethroplasty at a later date.

Keywords: Penile fracture; urethral injury; erectile dysfunction; penile injury; urethral stricture


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-22-ab180
Cite this abstract as: Qaoud Y, Norton S, Ferede A, Forde J, Power R, Smyth G, Little D, Quinlan M, Davis N, Mohammed W, Mohan P. AB180. SOH22ABS229. Surgical management and post-operative functional outcomes of patients with penile fracture: a retrospective review of a single institution’s experience over 10 years. Mesentery Peritoneum 2022;6:AB180.

Download Citation