AB199. SOH26AB_0077. An evaluation of the treatment of perianal fistulas in Portiuncula University Hospital
General Surgery Posters I

AB199. SOH26AB_0077. An evaluation of the treatment of perianal fistulas in Portiuncula University Hospital

Fiona Quirke1, Joseph Garvin1,2

1School of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 2Department of Surgery, Portiuncula University Hospital, Ballinasloe, Ireland


Background: Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal channel between the anal canal and the perianal skin. The most common causes of perianal fistulas include perianal abscesses and the presence of Crohn’s disease. Treatment methods include advancement flaps, seton placement, ligation of tracts, fistulotomy, fistulectomy, and/or use of biological agents. The objective of this audit was to assess the treatment of fistula-in-ano with respect to the time to final procedure, number of procedures, and recurrence rates at Portiuncula University Hospital (PUH).

Methods: Patients treated for perianal fistulas between January 2023 and December 2024 were identified from theatre appointment records. Patient Reference Numbers were used to identify patients’ charts, and patient information was coded and anonymised. The extracted data included initial referral dates, date of the first outpatient appointment, procedure dates and details, and discharge status. Microsoft Excel was used to store the data of dates and procedures. Analysis was also conducted using Microsoft Excel.

Results: The initial treatment in all patients involved seton insertion. Fifteen of the twenty patients had received treatment by fistulotomy or fistulectomy. The remaining five patients are still being observed for their exchanges at regular intervals. The average number of procedures prior to fistulotomy or fistulectomy was 2.46. The recurrence rate for further treatment post-fistulotomy or fistulectomy was 13.3%.

Conclusions: The recurrence rate post-fistulotomy or fistulectomy was 13.3% among patients in PUH. The current practice of seton treatment prior to definitive treatment is in line with current guidelines and recommendations.

Keywords: Fistula; fistulectomy; fistulotomy; perianal; treatment


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab199
Cite this abstract as: Quirke F, Garvin J. AB199. SOH26AB_0077. An evaluation of the treatment of perianal fistulas in Portiuncula University Hospital. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB199.

Download Citation