AB191. SOH26AB_0456. Pilot testing of an AI-powered prescribing support tool for identifying drug-drug interactions in surgical inpatients
Urology Posters

AB191. SOH26AB_0456. Pilot testing of an AI-powered prescribing support tool for identifying drug-drug interactions in surgical inpatients

Roshan Singh Ajeet Singh, Wymin Sivakumar, Derek Hennessey

Department of Urology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland


Background: Polypharmacy significantly increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in hospitalised surgical patients, necessitating rapid and reliable detection to enhance medication safety. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may support clinicians by improving the speed and accuracy of DDI identification. This pilot study aimed to evaluate a prototype AI-powered prescribing assistant and compared its performance with clinical pharmacist review and a commonly used large language model (ChatGPT).

Methods: Nineteen surgical inpatient medication lists were analysed. The British National Formulary (BNF) served as the gold-standard reference for all DDIs. Three modalities assessed each case: pharmacist review, the prototype AI tool (Katana AI), and ChatGPT. For each source, the total number of flagged interactions, confirmation against the BNF, time to generate results, and severity classification (moderate, cautionary, severe) were recorded. All findings were independently verified by clinicians and pharmacists.

Results: Across 19 cases, 156 medications were reviewed (median, 8; range, 3–14). Katana AI identified 49 DDIs, of which 47 were confirmed, achieving 97.9% accuracy. Pharmacists flagged 81 DDIs with 73 confirmed (90.1% accuracy), while ChatGPT flagged 142 DDIs, with 92 confirmed (64.8% accuracy). The AI tool generated reports in a mean time of 44 seconds, similar to ChatGPT (41 seconds) and markedly faster than pharmacists (249 seconds). A minor software limitation accounted for two missed interactions.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that a prototype AI-powered prescribing assistant can accurately and rapidly identify clinically relevant DDIs in surgical inpatients. The tool outperformed ChatGPT and closely matched pharmacist accuracy, while delivering results in a fraction of the time required for manual review. Although a minor software limitation resulted in a small number of missed interactions, these early findings highlight the potential of AI systems to strengthen medication safety, reduce human-error risk, and enhance prescribing efficiency in acute care settings. Continued refinement and larger-scale clinical validation are warranted before routine clinical integration.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI); drug-drug interactions (DDIs); medication safety; polypharmacy; prescribing support tools


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab191
Cite this abstract as: Singh RSA, Sivakumar W, Hennessey D. AB191. SOH26AB_0456. Pilot testing of an AI-powered prescribing support tool for identifying drug-drug interactions in surgical inpatients. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB191.

Download Citation