AB161. SOH26AB_0311. A retrospective analysis of the learning curve for total knee replacement for a newly appointed orthopaedic consultant: accumulative sum analysis
Orthopaedic Session II

AB161. SOH26AB_0311. A retrospective analysis of the learning curve for total knee replacement for a newly appointed orthopaedic consultant: accumulative sum analysis

Euan O’Mathuna1, Olive Shaju2, Victoria Byrne2, Gerard Sheridan2

1Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland; 2Department of Orthopaedics, Bons Secours Hospital, Galway, Ireland


Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) is the most common large joint arthroplasty and presents a learning curve for new consultants. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method is a statistical tool that visualises this curve, with the point of inflection indicating when operative efficiency is achieved. We aimed to apply the CUSUM score for a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon.

Methods: We reviewed the first 77 elective TKR procedures performed by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon in his initial post across public and private practice. Tourniquet time in minutes was recorded and ordered chronologically. A Mann-Whitney U test compared mean tourniquet times between the first 38 and the second 39 cases. CUSUM analysis was used to determine the learning curve and point of inflection.

Results: The overall mean tourniquet time was 68.23±22.24 minutes. Mean operative time for the first 38 cases was 68.84±14.68 minutes, compared with 57.27±8.95 minutes for the second 39, a significant difference (P=0.001). CUSUM analysis identified the point of inflection at case 32. There was also a significant difference in mean tourniquet time between public (76.53±29.09 minutes) and private (62.53±13.68 minutes) cases. Separate learning curves for public and private practice were generated.

Conclusions: The early portion of the learning curve showed fluctuation, suggesting an initial adjustment period as the surgeon adapted to new roles and environments. Efficiency was reached after approximately 33 cases. Public and private operative times differed significantly. Factors affecting the learning curve likely included case volume, adaptation to different hospital settings, and familiarity with the TKR procedure gained during fellowship.

Keywords: Cumulative sum (CUSUM); total knee replacement (TKR); learning curve; public; private


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab161
Cite this abstract as: O’Mathuna E, Shaju O, Byrne V, Sheridan G. AB161. SOH26AB_0311. A retrospective analysis of the learning curve for total knee replacement for a newly appointed orthopaedic consultant: accumulative sum analysis. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB161.

Download Citation