AB152. SOH26AB_0295. Neuraxial anaesthesia without general anaesthesia for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, safety, and post-operative outcomes
Colorectal Session II

AB152. SOH26AB_0295. Neuraxial anaesthesia without general anaesthesia for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, safety, and post-operative outcomes

Jaedan Chablal1, Alexios Karakatsanis2, Peter Neary1

1Department of Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; 2Department of Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland


Background: Colorectal surgery is frequently performed in older, co-morbid patients at increased cardiopulmonary risk under general anaesthesia (GA). Neuraxial anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation may mitigate these risks, but evidence is fragmented. We summarised the feasibility, safety, and postoperative outcomes of neuraxial anaesthesia without routine GA for major colorectal surgery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched to identify major colorectal resections performed under spinal, epidural, or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation. Comparative and non-comparative studies were included. Primary outcomes were feasibility (completion without conversion to GA) and major complications or mortality; secondary outcomes included respiratory function, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, pain, opioid use, and bowel recovery.

Results: Across studies, neuraxial anaesthesia was successfully used for open and minimally invasive colorectal surgery, often in frail or high-risk patients. Comparative studies showed similar complications, mortality, stay, and bowel recovery to GA, with signals of benefit for blood loss, respiratory function, and in some series, operative time. Non-comparative series reported acceptable haemodynamic stability, low ICU utilisation, and favourable patient experience.

Conclusions: Existing literature suggests neuraxial anaesthesia without routine GA is feasible for selected major colorectal surgery, with reassuring short-term safety and recovery. Larger comparative studies are needed to define patient selection and quantify benefits versus risks.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; epidural anaesthesia; neuraxial anaesthesia; post-operative outcomes; spinal anaesthesia


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab152
Cite this abstract as: Chablal J, Karakatsanis A, Neary P. AB152. SOH26AB_0295. Neuraxial anaesthesia without general anaesthesia for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, safety, and post-operative outcomes. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB152.

Download Citation