AB146. SOH26AB_0309. The effectiveness, safety, and best practices of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection in the management of pain conditions: a systematic review
Anaesthesia Session

AB146. SOH26AB_0309. The effectiveness, safety, and best practices of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection in the management of pain conditions: a systematic review

Harry McGrath1, Ahmed Rasheed1, Hanna Balytska1, Dominic Harmon1, Marium Javed2

1Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; 2Department of Medical Education, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland


Background: Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection (US-HD) is an emerging minimally invasive intervention used to separate compressed peripheral or spinal nerves from adjacent soft tissues using injectate under ultrasound visualization. Increasing clinical interest has led to expanding applications across neuropathic pain syndromes, particularly carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radicular pain. This systematic review evaluates the current evidence surrounding clinical effectiveness, safety, and evolving best-practice technique standards.

Methods: A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, focusing on studies published over the past 15 years. Eligible studies involved adult patients undergoing US-HD for neuropathic or nociceptive pain. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series, anatomical research, and systematic reviews were included. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology.

Results: Across the included studies, US-HD demonstrated consistent improvements in pain reduction, function, and symptom severity in entrapment neuropathies. The strongest evidence supports its use in CTS, with growing support for cervical radicular pain and other peripheral nerve entrapments. Complication rates were low and predominantly mild, including transient pain or dizziness. Best-practice elements—including in-plane needle visualization, dextrose-based injectates, and real-time image confirmation—were identified, although methods remain heterogeneous.

Conclusions: US-HD appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for nerve entrapment-related pain and may offer a less invasive alternative to surgical decompression. However, standardization of technique, injectate formulation, and follow-up protocols is needed. Large, well-designed controlled trials are required to validate current findings and define optimal practice recommendations.

Keywords: Systematic review; hydrodissection; neuropathic pain; radicular pain; ultrasound


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab146
Cite this abstract as: McGrath H, Rasheed A, Balytska H, Harmon D, Javed M. AB146. SOH26AB_0309. The effectiveness, safety, and best practices of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection in the management of pain conditions: a systematic review. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB146.

Download Citation