AB130. SOH26AB_0257. Complication rates in hand surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet vs. other anaesthetic techniques
Systematic Reviews Session

AB130. SOH26AB_0257. Complication rates in hand surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet vs. other anaesthetic techniques

Laoise Kenny, Niall McInerney

Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland


Background: Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) has emerged as an alternative to conventional anaesthetic modalities in hand surgery. Through the combined use of lidocaine and epinephrine, WALANT provides effective analgesia and haemostasis without sedation or tourniquet application, enabling intraoperative functional assessment. Although increasingly adopted, anaesthetic practice remains heterogeneous, and uncertainties persist regarding the comparative safety of WALANT. This review aims to synthesise evidence on complication rates and secondary outcomes to clarify its role within contemporary practice.

Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases identified randomized controlled trials comparing WALANT with general, regional, or local anaesthesia in adult hand surgery. Eligible English-language studies reported complication rates, with secondary outcomes including procedure type, anaesthetic formulation, intra- and postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to account for methodological and clinical heterogeneity.

Results: Six randomized controlled trials encompassing 433 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall complication rates between WALANT and comparator anaesthetic techniques [relative risk (RR) =0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31–1.67; P=0.45; I2=17%]. Complications were infrequent across all groups, with no reports of digital ischaemia. Pain outcomes were comparable or lower with WALANT, and patient satisfaction was consistently high.

Conclusions: WALANT appears to be a safe, well-tolerated anaesthetic strategy for hand surgery, exhibiting low complication rates and favourable patient-reported outcomes. Further high-quality, adequately powered trials are warranted to consolidate current evidence and delineate its optimal application across surgical contexts.

Keywords: Adrenaline; anaesthesia; complications; hand surgery; wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT)


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab130
Cite this abstract as: Kenny L, McInerney N. AB130. SOH26AB_0257. Complication rates in hand surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet vs. other anaesthetic techniques. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB130.

Download Citation