AB025. SOH26AB_0262. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT for differentiating malignant and benign adrenal incidentalomas: a systematic review
Radiology Session

AB025. SOH26AB_0262. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT for differentiating malignant and benign adrenal incidentalomas: a systematic review

Aine Daly, Brian Murphy, Leon Walsh

Department of Radiology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland


Background: Adrenal masses are incidentally identified (adrenal incidentalomas) in about 5% of cross-sectional abdominal imaging conducted for non-adrenal indications. The frequent use of serial and multi-modality imaging in the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas contributes substantially to healthcare costs and can be burdensome for patients. Clear guidance is required to determine the most appropriate imaging modality for characterising incidental adrenal lesions.

Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP), Embase, and Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comparative diagnostic studies assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT) in adrenal incidentalomas. Evidence was screened for study quality, applicability, and diagnostic accuracy outcomes to determine the highest-level data informing imaging practice.

Results: The search identified a substantial body of literature, with two high-quality systematic reviews providing the most rigorous evidence. CT demonstrated consistently robust diagnostic accuracy, with unenhanced attenuation ≤10 Hounsfield units (HU) serving as a reliable criterion for excluding malignancy, and adrenal washout CT offering additional discriminatory value when appropriately applied. In contrast, MRI performance, though promising, was supported by smaller and methodologically heterogeneous studies, reducing confidence in pooled estimates. Overall, CT remains the better-supported modality, with insufficient evidence to establish MRI superiority.

Conclusions: Current evidence indicates that CT provides the most reliable and well-validated criteria for excluding malignancy in adrenal incidentalomas, with both unenhanced attenuation thresholds and adrenal washout protocols contributing valuable diagnostic information. Although MRI provides complementary insights, its performance is supported by less robust and more heterogeneous data. Optimizing imaging pathways by prioritizing high-value tests may reduce unnecessary investigations, lower costs, and streamline patient management.

Keywords: Adrenal incidentaloma; computed tomography (CT); diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-26-ab025
Cite this abstract as: Daly A, Murphy B, Walsh L. AB025. SOH26AB_0262. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus CT for differentiating malignant and benign adrenal incidentalomas: a systematic review. Mesentery Peritoneum 2026;10:AB025.

Download Citation