AB217. SOH25_AB_115. Cross-matching in spinal surgery: an audit on compliance with the maximum surgical blood order schedule
Orthopaedic Posters

AB217. SOH25_AB_115. Cross-matching in spinal surgery: an audit on compliance with the maximum surgical blood order schedule

Thomas McCarthy1, Michael Kelly1, Sam Lynch1, Conor Gleeson2, Niall Fahey1

1Orthopaedic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Phibsborough, Dublin, Ireland; 2Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland


Background: The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (MMUH) is the national spinal injury centre. It conducts a large volume of spinal surgeries in Ireland, necessitating a substantial volume of blood products. The objective of this audit was to assess the units of red cell concentrate (RCC) cross-matched for each spinal surgery in MMUH and compare it to the maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) standard.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of all spinal surgeries for the month of October 2024 in MMUH. We assessed how many units of RCC were cross-matched for each patient and compared this to the MSBOS.

Results: There were a total of 63 spinal surgeries in October. There was an excess of 58 units of RCC available intra-operatively when compared to the standard. Each unit costs €339 resulting in an overspend of €19,662 on over-subscribed RCC for the month of October. In total, 43% (n=27) of patients had excessive units crossmatched, 52% (n=33) had the correct amount and there were only three cases where the number of RCC requested pre-op was under the recommended amount. No case required further units to be ordered or crossmatched intra-operatively.

Conclusions: This audit demonstrates the lack of compliance with the MSBOS standard. Furthermore, there is a need for a more comprehensive guideline in the National Spinal Injuries Unit which accounts for the variety of surgeries carried out and avoids over burdening our blood transfusion service. Following instigation of this new guideline a second stage audit will evaluate the effect.

Keywords: Audit; compliance; crossmatch; spine; surgery


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-25-ab217
Cite this abstract as: McCarthy T, Kelly M, Lynch S, Gleeson C, Fahey N. AB217. SOH25_AB_115. Cross-matching in spinal surgery: an audit on compliance with the maximum surgical blood order schedule. Mesentery Peritoneum 2025;9:AB217.

Download Citation